<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Llm on Extra Long Division</title>
    <link>https://extralongdivision.com/tags/llm/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Llm on Extra Long Division</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:17:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://extralongdivision.com/tags/llm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>IDGAF I&#39;m Still using the Em Dash</title>
      <link>https://extralongdivision.com/articles/idgaf-im-still-using-the-emdash/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:17:14 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid>https://extralongdivision.com/articles/idgaf-im-still-using-the-emdash/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;AI&lt;sup id=&#34;fnref:1&#34;&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;#fn:1&#34; class=&#34;footnote-ref&#34; role=&#34;doc-noteref&#34;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; is ruining writing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t mean how AI slop is polluting the internet. I don&amp;rsquo;t mean &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-ai-ruining-our-skills-early-results-are-in-and-theyre-not-good/&#34;&gt;how our reliance on them is degrading our skills&lt;/a&gt;. I mean flesh and blood writers avoiding certain patterns to duck AI-use accusations. The most common one: the em dash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/18/magazine/chatgpt-dash-hyphen-writing-communication.html&#34;&gt;The New York Times defended the em dash better than me&lt;/a&gt;. My gripe is the unexpected burden AI has put on humans — proving they are human.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AI<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup> is ruining writing.</p>
<p>I don&rsquo;t mean how AI slop is polluting the internet. I don&rsquo;t mean <a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-ai-ruining-our-skills-early-results-are-in-and-theyre-not-good/">how our reliance on them is degrading our skills</a>. I mean flesh and blood writers avoiding certain patterns to duck AI-use accusations. The most common one: the em dash.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/18/magazine/chatgpt-dash-hyphen-writing-communication.html">The New York Times defended the em dash better than me</a>. My gripe is the unexpected burden AI has put on humans — proving they are human.</p>
<p>We all despise reCAPTCHA, but generative AI and LLMs<sup id="fnref:2"><a href="#fn:2" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">2</a></sup> are a different beast. Job candidates are holding up a hand in front of their face in zoom calls. Students run their essays through AI detection algorithms before submission.</p>
<p>But I have no one to convince. Even if it is a GPT<sup id="fnref:3"><a href="#fn:3" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">3</a></sup>-ism, IDGAF<sup id="fnref:4"><a href="#fn:4" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">4</a></sup> . I will continue to use my beloved em dash until data centers cause the heat death of humanity.</p>
<p><a href="/articles/please-define-your-jargon/">Why are there footnotes?</a></p>
<div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes">
<hr>
<ol>
<li id="fn:1">
<p>artificial intelligence&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
<li id="fn:2">
<p>large language models; Chat-GPT, Gemini, Perplexity, etc. are examples&#160;<a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
<li id="fn:3">
<p>Chat-GPT&#160;<a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
<li id="fn:4">
<p>I don&rsquo;t give a f*ck&#160;<a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
